The World Cup approaches: It is time to quick chat about ambush marketing

Ambush marketing can be defined as the attempt to attract attention and publicity during well known events that already holds its official sponsors. The intention is to lead the consumer to believe that the specific mark/company is endorsed by the event’s official organizers, not to mention the “free exposition” through the television! This type of unfair competition is quite common on big scale events, such as the World Cup, Lollapalooza and Rock in Rio.  

 

Every four years FIFA discloses its official sponsors, who invest significant amount of money to expose its trademarks and advertisement during the event with exclusivity (it is estimated that FIFA earned approximately US$ 100 million on sponsorship). The official sponsors hold the right to use the World Cup’s official symbols and to make direct reference to the event in its advertisements. Therefore, it is quite common that both FIFA and the official sponsorships goes to Court before and during the competition to challenge third parties that somehow takes advantage of the World Cup to promote its brands without any investment. 

 

There are two types of ambush marketing: by association and by intrusion. The ambush marketing by association takes places when a non-sponsor company uses the World Cup tradition logo to directly promote its goods, attracting the consumer attention and leading the public to understand that the brand is an official sponsor (status). 

 

 

On the other hand, the ambush marketing by intrusion of the advertising space happens when the non-sponsor uses the event’s space (the stadium, for example) to promote its brand. It is the classic case that happened on 2006 during the World Cup in Germany, when Brazilian player Ronaldinho Gaúcho had to take off a Nike hairband, since the official sponsor of the event was Adidas. It is interest noting that, after this episode, a sportive marketing consulting agency performed a survey that revealed that an expressive number of interviewed declared that the official sponsor was Nike! Another interesting case happened during the World Cup in South Africa, when a group of more than 30 Dutch women dressed all in orange entered in the stadium separately. They later gathered in the stadium, causing FIFA to state that it was an ambush marketing by intrusion planed by Bavaria, even tough the brand Bavaria was not exposed by the group. At the time, Budweiser was the official sponsor (the women were banned from the stadium and two of them were arrested).

 

It is not that non-sponsors cannot address absolutely nothing about the World Cup but shall carefully address the event’s attractivity and magnetism without using symbols or occupying the advertising space.

 

Author: Rafaella Franco, Associate Lawyer at Peduti Advogados.

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

The use of exaggeration in the advertising industry – the puffing technique

puffing advertising technique

Puffing is the advertising technique of using exaggerated adjectives, which may or may not cause misleading. This advertising practice is not prohibited in cases where the exaggeration used is evident and harmless and does not have the animosity or capacity to deceive the consumer.

In this sense, the use of puffing should be limited to its legitimacy of use when it does not mislead the consumer or causes him to acquire what he does not want because it is excessive and abusive advertising. Therefore, when exaggeration is easily observed, there is legitimacy for use.

The brazilian doctrine understands that puffing is not prohibited, as it is represented “as flashy advertising, whose subjective or playful character does not allow it to be objectively seen as binding.”¹

To test whether or not there is a subjective criterion, which does not use a critical and individual assessment of the consumer. Thus, the personal element (personal opinion) will prevail, and consumers will choose the product according to their personal interests and motivations and will not respond to the exaggerations caused by puffing as “the best flavor”, “the film of the year” etc.

puffing advertising technique

Additionally, as the puffing technique is very common when exaggeration is used to refer to the subjective elements of the product to which the ad refers, such as the expressions “the most delicious”, “the best flavor”, “the most welcoming”, and there is no need to demand proof of such statements, as consumers’ opinions about the product or service will certainly be different. For this reason, the consumer does not credit the ad for its exaggerated subjective character.

It can be used as an advertising technique when it is perfectly possible for the consumer to understand the exaggerated and sumptuous character of advertising, when it is, for example, an exaggeration that has a subjective aspect as its object.

If the exaggeration refers to an element that can be objectively measured and, after criteria have been established and the evaluation has been carried out, the object of the puffing does not correspond to the reality of the advertised product or service, advertising will be misleading.

If it’s considered a misleading information/advertisement, it can be fought by unfair competition supported by the brazilian law.

¹ JUNIOR, Nelson Nery. Os princípios gerais do Código Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor, Revista, p. 67

Lawyer Author of the Comment: Laís Iamauchi de Araujo

Source: The puffing advertising technique

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”
“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”