The progress of European Union regarding the draft law that will regulate Artificial Intelligence

It has been two years since the European Commission started to write the Artificial Intelligence Law, to regulate increasing AI technology, which is in highly evidence nowadays, since ChatGPT was launched.

 

In this sense, companies that implement Artificial Intelligence tools will have to publicize every material used to develop their systems that is copyright protected. This disposition was late created, since some commission members wanted to definitely prohibit the use of copyrights to train generative models.

 

 

Furthermore, it is being suggested that Artificial Intelligence tools be classified according to their perceived level of risk: minimal to limited, high and unacceptable. Regarding the areas of concern, it can be included biometric surveillance, dissemination of misinformation or discriminatory language.

 

The members of European Parliament agreed to take the project to the next level, when it will be discussed the final details of Artificial Intelligence Law. Once it is approved, this law will be the first one, worldwide, to regulate the subject of Artificial Intelligence.

 

Author: Marília de Oliveira Fogaça and Cesar Peduti Filho, Peduti Advogados.

Source: União Europeia propõe novas refras de direitos autorais para a IA Generativa 

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

Employee is punished in an employment claim for violating the Brazilian General Personal Data Protection Law

With the entry into force of the Brazilian General Personal Data Protection Law – Law No. 13.709/2018 (“LGPD”) in September 2020, in Brazil, many doubts arose about how it would be applied in labor relations, relations that use a massive number of personal data. With the Law, there was an obligation for employers to have more attention in how they process personal data and, also, in how they guide their employees to process personal data correctly on their behalf.

 

Initially, it should be noted that the LGPD does not overlap with the Brazilian labor law, but complements it, in order to guarantee greater protection to its data subjects. Regarding hospitals, the obligation to process data in accordance with the law becomes even more evident, considering that a large part of the data processed is considered special category data, as it involves health data. The risk becomes even greater considering that the data subjects may involve children, teenagers and the elderly, an even more vulnerable group of people.  

 

Given this scenario, in an unprecedented sentence, a nurse had his request for constructive termination dismissed due to a LGPD violation, which is why the hospital requested his discharge with cause in the employment claim.

 

 

In order to prove, in the lawsuit, the allegation that the hospital had committed faults and failed to comply with labor obligations, the claimant attached spreadsheets of the Hospitalization Management System to the suit. The hospital, in turn, claimed that this would be a very serious fault, due to appropriation of confidential documents, which the employee would only have access because of his position held.

 

According to the judgment, “the claimant violated the intimacy and privacy of third parties, natural persons who are clients of the defendant, and violated the General Personal Data Protection Law – LGPD, using special category data illegally. Also, it made the company violate the LGPD, as it was responsible for guarding the special category data of its clients. Finally, the claimant failed to comply with the express rule of the defendant, of which the claimant was duly informed.”

 

In that case, it is essential that, besides the need to implement technical and organizational security measures, it is really important the dissemination of a data protection culture internally, a right that is even considered a fundamental right by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988.

 

It is undeniable that the scenario of LGPD application, in lawsuits in Brazil, is still very new. This judgment, however, demonstrated a trend of compliance with the Law, so attention will be needed for future decisions and how this symbiosis of data protection with labor relations will take place.

 

Author: Caroline Muniz and Cesar Peduti, Peduti Advogados.

Source: Empregado viola LGPD em Pedido de Rescisão Indireta e é Punido com Justa Causa

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

How music samples communities impacts in copyrights lawsuits

Updated May 31, 2023.

 

The practice of sampling is especially pervasive in music culture. It consists of in taking a small part of a song and mixing it with another one, creating a new music, but still in a way that is often possible to identify the sharp influence of the music originally embodied.

 

The practice of sampling is especially pervasive in music culture. It consists of taking a small part of a song and mixing it with another one, creating new music. However, this often leads to copyright infringement issues as the samples are usually not cleared by the original artists.

 

In recent years hip-hop artists have been finding challenges in their own community of fans. The cultural practice of the sample is identified by the fans of these artists themselves and who are dedicated to identifying the songs originally mixed, which leads them to share their knowledge in comment sessions of specialized blogs, on Youtube, collections such as “WhoSampleWho” and social networks in general. This type of content is like a treasure hunt for copyright lawyers.

 

 

In recent years, hip-hop artists have faced challenges within their own fan community. Fans dedicated to identifying the songs that were originally sampled share their knowledge in comment sections of specialized blogs, YouTube, and social networks. Platforms like “WhoSampleWho” serve as treasure hunts for copyright lawyers.

 

Interestingly, the well-meaning engagement of fans has unintentionally discouraged artists from using uncleared samples. The increased publicity surrounding the tracks has made it easier to identify the artists involved, leading to a rise in copyright infringement lawsuits.

 

It is true that a legal process of sampling, guided by specialized lawyers, can benefit both parties involved; the artist who wishes to produce a sample and the original artist whose work is being sampled.

Author: Ana Luiza Pires, Cesar Peduti and Thaís de Kássia Almeida Penteado, Peduti Advogados.

Source: Sample Snitching: How Online Fan Chatter Can Create Legal Trouble for Rap Producers

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

The use of trademarks in keyword advertising in Brazil

Updated May 31, 2023.

 

Keyword advertising has gained popularity worldwide. However, the use of competitors’ trademarks in keyword advertising has sparked conflicts between companies, and Courts from different jurisdictions have adopted varied interpretations of this practice.

 

In Brazil, although there is no specific law forbidding the use of third-party trademarks in keyword advertising, the Superior Court of Justice has ruled on several cases, establishing a consistent understanding that this behavior constitutes unfair competition. This is in line with Article 195, III of the Brazilian Intellectual Property Law, which states: 

 

Article 195 – A crime of unfair competition is committed by anyone who uses fraudulent means to divert another’s clientele for their own or a third party’s benefit.

 

 

In these cases, the Courts have ordered the immediate cessation of the unauthorized use of keywords and have awarded compensation for both moral and material damages to the trademark owners. Typically, these compensations amount to no more than BRL 20,000. However, in some instances, depending on the size of the companies involved, the compensations have exceeded BRL 50,000.

 

In view of the scenario above, it is highly advisable to refrain from using third-party trademarks in keyword advertising in Brazil, even though there is no specific prohibition on this matter.

 

Author:  Carollina Souza Marfará, Cesar Peduti and Thaís de Kássia Almeida Penteado, Peduti Advogados.

“If you want to learn more about this topic, contact the author or the managing partner, Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”

“Se quiser saber mais sobre este tema, contate o autor ou o Dr. Cesar Peduti Filho.”